The devil is in the details, and as the much ballyhooed budget deal reached by House Weeper John Boehner and President Barack Obama is dissected, an evil, despicable lie is revealed: Those “amazing” promised cuts are non-existent.
A report from the Congressional Budget Office indicates the $38 billion Congress supposedly cut from the budget in a deal reached April 8 after days of brinkmanship isn’t really $38 billion. It’s actually less than one-tenth of that: $352 million.
Not that $38 billion was a cut in the first place. It paled in comparison to the paltry $100 billion promised by Republicans trolling for votes last November, which paled next to a $1.5 trillion budget and a so-called $15 trillion debt.
Weeper Boehner and Congressional Republicans (outside of those with the surname Paul) have no intention of cutting government in any significant way. They can’t even cut it back to the previously unbelievable Bush-era numbers. They only favor cutting when shilling for your vote.
The elected elites work for government and, left to their own devices and unburdened from fear of being kicked out of office, they have no intention of cutting. What they do want to do, however, is to raise taxes.
Obama wants to raise taxes on the “rich.” To Obama, the rich is anyone drawing a paycheck. And some in Congress are talking about a Federal tax on Internet transactions.
In other words, the American middle class is the turnip and government is ready to give them another squeeze.
But we don’t have a revenue problem in America. We have a spending problem. And we have only two members of Congress who really understand that. Ron Paul and Rand Paul.
Oh, there are some Congressional Republicans—those elected under the Tea Party banner—who voted against the deal. But I doubt they really understand the depth of the spending problem.
After all, none of them are advocating cutting military spending, which consumed almost $1 trillion in 2009, according to economist Robert Higgs as quoted in Thomas E. Wood Jr.’s book, Rollback.
We also have a tax problem, but not the one that some of the elites would have you believe. Those that are advocating a tax increase on individuals want you to think the problem is that the rich aren’t taxed enough and if we just took some of their earnings, everything would be fine.
But if all the taxable income of everyone earning more than $100,000 was taxed at 100 percent, the earnings would not cover the spending in Obama’s budget plan.
The top 12 multinational corporations? Now that’s another story. But no one is talking about taxing them, despite the fact that they don’t pay taxes and, in some cases, get tax refunds in the billions.
According to a report on Alternet.org, General Electric has paid no taxes since 2006 despite earning $26 billion since then. In fact, in 2006 GE received a tax refund of $4.1 billion. Last year, Bank of America made $4.4 billion and received a refund of $1.9 billion. Other tax avoiders include Verizon, ExxonMobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Valero, Boeing, FedEx, Carnival Cruise Lines, Citi and Goldman Sachs.
These companies used a tax haven given to corporations that do business overseas—but not available to companies doing business solely in the United States—to reduce their tax liability. How did this happen? They spent billions of dollars lobbying the elected elites to gouge out loopholes in the tax laws.
In fact, according to the Alternet.org report, 83 of the 100 largest publicly traded U.S. corporations use these tax havens to reduce their tax liability. So not only is Congress encouraging corporations to move their jobs overseas, it is penalizing companies that choose to remain in the U.S. to do business. And penalizing American workers.
And we wonder why our jobs are going overseas?
But I’ve told you before that taxes are not designed to raise revenue for the government. Income taxes have three purposes: To control and redistribute the volume of money, to direct the behavior of people and corporations and to keep a dossier on all citizens.
“But what about the debt?” you might ask. To which I would reply, “What debt?”
There is none. If the Federal government can print money to infinity, how can there be debt? That word is doublespeak designed to keep you enslaved to the elites and moneychangers.
Think about it. If you had a machine that could crank out legal tender in whatever amount needed to pay off your debts, would you have any debt? Of course not.
And neither does the U.S. government. It is the biggest Ponzi scheme in the history of the world. Yet it’s Bernie Madoff who sits in jail.
So if you’ve put off filing you income tax until today, as you seal that envelope and put it into the mailbox, remember this: The devil is in the details.
And of course, Satan is the father of lies.
GOP, White House both think they have leverage in debt-ceiling fight
By Peter Schroeder
-
04/17/11 12:00 PM ET
Republicans and the White House both think they have the upper hand in the fight over raising the country's debt limit.
Republicans enjoy popular backing, as polls suggest voters do not want to see the debt ceiling raised. They also know that vulnerable Democratic senators up for reelection next year have no desire to cast votes on raising the debt ceiling.
“The Republicans have a huge amount of leverage,” said Chris Edwards, director of tax policy for the libertarian Cato Institute. “They know this is a huge opportunity.”
The White House and liberal groups disagree.
They believe President Obama’s bully pulpit gives him the advantage. Administration officials are already warning that a failure to raise the debt ceiling would raise interest rates and destabilize the global economy, putting at risk the hundreds of thousands of jobs now being generated in a fledgling recovery.
The administration hopes Republicans will blink and agree to a deal, just as they did when the government was nearly shut down over an impasse over 2011 spending cuts.
In a column for The Hill, conservative commentator Dick Morris said Republicans would give up their leverage by agreeing to the deal with Obama on 2011 spending.
“If Republicans in the House accede to Democratic and administration demands that they accept a lesser figure in budget cuts, they will throw away all their power and be revealed as toothless and impotent, though still noisy,” he wrote before the spending deal was reached.
Another advantage for President Obama is that he knows both sides can’t avoid raising the debt ceiling. Even the most conservative Republican budgets would require debt-ceiling hikes in just a few months.
Of course, Republicans have all but acknowledged the debt ceiling will be raised. Their point is that it must be linked with huge spending cuts to win their support.
The White House has called for a “clean” bill to raise the debt ceiling, but Obama himself in a Friday interview said the ceiling would not be raised without spending cuts.
Polling consistently shows American voters opposed to any increase to the debt limit.
A poll commissioned by The Hill in February found just 27 percent of likely voters were in favor of an increase, while 62 percent opposed it. Significantly, 64 percent of independents opposed an increase.
More recently, an April 11 NBC/Wall Street Journal poll found that just 16 percent of Americans think the limit should be increased, while 46 percent opposed it. When the same poll informed those surveyed that the U.S. would default if the limit wasn't raised, an increase was still opposed by a 62-32 percent margin.
However, if the debt limit drags on to the point that financial markets begin reacting negatively to the potential for a U.S. default, public sentiment could turn.
“People may not fully understand the ramifications of what the debt-limit vote is itself, but when we start having stories about banks concerned about raising interest rates, people will be able to translate that relatively quickly,” said Neera Tanden, the chief operating officer for the liberal Center for American Progress.
Republicans are pushing a number of legislative proposals they want to see tied to a vote on raising the debt limit. Some are pushing for a balanced-budget amendment, while others are advocating for spending caps to be put in place. And House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) has said his budget proposal presents a “menu of options” that can be packaged with a debt-limit vote.
But Republicans could jeopardize their leverage if they cannot come together on what, exactly, they want.
“The Achilles’ heel of Republicans will be if they don't congeal around an agreed-upon plan,” said Edwards. “I don't see any coming together so far ... They need to decide on it quickly in the next few weeks and sell it to the public.”
GOP allies in the business world support cutting government spending, but do not want to see Congress miss raising the debt ceiling.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donohue has consistently called for a debt ceiling increase, while Jamie Dimon, the chairman and CEO of JPMorgan Chase, said in March that people opposing raising the debt limit are “crazy.”
That kind of rhetoric is expected to intensify in the coming months, and if markets are rattled, it could play against the GOP.
Another factor in the GOP’s favor is that Obama himself voted against raising the debt ceiling as a senator. The president now says this was a mistake and a “political vote,” but it hurts his argument that the GOP should now set aside politics.
The split nature of Congress also complicates the politics. In the Senate, Democrats are likely to have to cast the tough votes, while in the House, many Republicans ultimately must vote to raise the debt ceiling.
This means that no matter who wins the leverage game, both parties will have some skin in the game of raising the limit.
FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those interested thereto for non-commercial, personal research and educational purposes. If further information should be required, or you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes beyond 'fair use', permission must be obtained from original copyright owners. For more information goto: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
![[Get Copyright Permissions]](http://license.icopyright.net/images/icopy-w.gif){kind=small}
Click here for copyright permissions!